Workyard alternative
Workyard is genuinely good at one thing: accurate, GPS-verified field time that flows into payroll and job costing. If precise labor hours are your whole problem, it is a fine answer. But most contractors also need daily reports, cost-code productivity, RFIs, AIA billing, QA/QC, safety, and weld mapping — and that is a separate tool with Workyard. Field PM does the field time AND the full construction PM stack in one platform.
Workyard — A strong GPS time-tracking and labor-cost platform for contractors — accurate field hours tied to jobs, feeding payroll and job costing. Excellent at what it does, but it is a labor backbone, not full project management.
Field PM
$99/mo
starting · no contract · cancel anytime
Workyard
Per user
per user, time module only
Feature by feature, dollar for dollar.
| Feature | Field PM | Workyard |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Full construction PM | Time + labor costing |
| GPS-geofenced time clock | Included (add-on) | Core strength |
| Labor cost by job / code | Cost-code productivity | Strong |
| Scheduling / dispatch | Lookahead + service add-on | Crew scheduling |
| Daily field reports | Core, feeds costing | Basic notes |
| Budget vs actual + S-curve | Included | Labor cost only |
| RFIs & change orders | Included | Not offered |
| AIA G702/G703 billing | Included | Not offered |
| QA/QC & punch lists | Hold points + e-sign | Not offered |
| Safety + OSHA 300 log | Automatic | Not offered |
| Weld mapping / NDE | Included free | Not offered |
| Payroll export / sync | CSV + QuickBooks | Strong (many providers) |
| Free field seats | Unlimited & free | Per user |
| Free trial | 30 days, no card | Trial / demo |
Let us be fair to Workyard: its GPS time tracking is one of the better implementations on the market. Accurate geofenced clock-in/out, mileage, and crew scheduling that ties hours to jobs and pushes clean numbers into payroll — for a contractor whose bleeding point is inaccurate or padded timecards, that alone can pay for the software. Electrical and multi-crew contractors in particular like it as a labor-and-time backbone.
The honest boundary is scope. Workyard is built to answer "who worked, where, for how long, and what did that labor cost." It is not built to run the project — there is no daily reporting of any depth, no RFI or change-order log, no AIA billing, no QA/QC hold points, no safety recordkeeping, and no weld mapping. Those live in whatever other systems you are also paying for.
Field PM includes a GPS-geofenced time clock too, so you get the same accurate field hours — but those hours are one input into a full construction platform. The foreman files a five-minute daily report (or dictates it and AI fills the form): crew, hours, quantities installed, equipment, weather, photos. Those hours hit cost codes and immediately drive productivity (units per man-hour), an S-curve, and a running margin forecast. Time tracking tells you what labor cost; Field PM tells you whether the job is winning or losing while you can still act on it.
On top of that sit the workflows a project contractor is contractually and legally required to run: RFIs and change orders that roll into the budget, submittals, AIA G702/G703 progress billing with retainage, QA/QC inspections with e-signature hold points, an automatic OSHA 300 safety log, and drawing-linked weld mapping for mechanical and piping scopes. That is the difference between a labor tool and a project system.
The real comparison is not "Field PM vs Workyard on time tracking" — it is "Field PM alone vs Workyard plus a separate PM/billing/QA/safety system." A contractor running Workyard for time almost always has a second tool (or a pile of spreadsheets) for daily reports, job costing rollup, billing, and compliance. Every seam between those tools is double entry and a place where the number goes wrong.
Field PM collapses that into one login and one dataset: the same field hours Workyard captures, plus the reporting, costing, billing, quality, and safety that surround them. Unlimited foremen, QA/QC, safety, and subs are free, so putting the whole crew on it is not a per-seat decision.
Choose Workyard if your single problem is accurate field time and labor cost, you already have project management and billing handled elsewhere, and you want a best-in-class time backbone to feed them.
Choose Field PM if you want the field hours and the whole project in one place — daily reports, cost-code productivity, RFIs, AIA billing, QA/QC, safety, and weld mapping — with a GPS time clock included and the field on for free. Confirm current Workyard features and pricing on their site; this page reflects publicly available information and our own product. Try Field PM free for 30 days on a real project first.
Yes, especially if you want more than time tracking. Field PM includes a GPS-geofenced time clock and adds full construction project management — daily reports, cost-code productivity, RFIs, AIA billing, QA/QC, safety, and weld mapping. Workyard is a strong labor/time backbone but does not do project management, billing, or compliance.
Yes. Field PM's Time Clock add-on offers GPS-geofenced clock-in/out, photo verification, manhour pre-fill, and payroll-ready export plus QuickBooks sync. Workyard is deeper on the pure time/scheduling side; Field PM ties those hours directly into job costing, billing, and PM.
Daily field reports that feed cost codes, budget-vs-actual and S-curve productivity, RFIs and change orders, AIA G702/G703 progress billing, QA/QC inspections with hold points, an automatic OSHA 300 log, and weld mapping — none of which a time-tracking tool provides.
Often, yes. Contractors running Workyard for time usually run a second system for reports, job costing, billing, and compliance. Field PM combines the field time clock with all of that in one platform, removing the double entry between them.
30-day free trial, no credit card, full access — including the time clock and the full PM stack.
30-day free trial · no credit card · cancel anytime · unlimited foremen, QAQC, safety & subs always free.
Start free trial →Evaluating multiple options? Here are the other comparisons our customers run.