The CoConstruct alternative for commercial GCs, mechanical contractors, and specialty trades.

Yes — for that specific niche. CoConstruct's selections, warranty workflows, and homeowner client portal are stronger if you're building 10-50 custom homes per year and the buyer experience is your differentiator. Field PM would be overkill for that workflow.

Field PM is the better fit. The daily-report and productivity-tracking features carry over cleanly to light-commercial and TI work, where CoConstruct's residential-specific feature depth would be wasted on you.

Yes — those are core target customers. Productivity tracking by cost code (with budgeted vs actual hours and quantity installed) is the killer feature for trades that bid on installed quantity rather than fixed-price builds.

CSV exports for projects, contacts, daily logs, change orders, and cost data are all supported on both sides. Plan an afternoon for the import + a follow-up week to verify numbers and rebuild any custom views.

Yes, but lighter. Field PM's customer portal shares daily reports, invoices, RFIs, and service-call status. It's not as feature-rich as CoConstruct's homeowner portal (selections approval, warranty submission, etc.). For commercial customers it's a fine fit; for premium custom-home work, CoConstruct's client experience is more polished.

For a 5-10 person office team with 20+ field crew, Field PM is typically 50-70% cheaper. CoConstruct charges per office user. Field PM charges per office user too — but foremen, QAQC, safety, and subs are always free and unlimited.